The Nonprofit FAQ

How much leeway should a website editor have?
On Feb 25, 2004, Jeff wrote to Nonprofit (see http://www.rain.org/mailman/listinfo/nonprofit) to ask:

How much leeway and judgment should a web master have in maintaining
the
information on a web site for a nonprofit? Should a web master just
blindly implement everything that the board tells him without
questioning
its accuracy even though the web master knows the misinformation could
hurt
the organization's image? This is not a question of the web master
being
disloyal in speaking up and questioning this information, it is a
matter of
caring enough about the organization to make sure the information is
properly represented and factual. I don't think many people realize
that
what is on a web site is a public reflection of the nonprofit. Do any
of
you have rules and guidelines for web masters?

My own role as webmaster has grown out of my work within my agency
doing
direct service, so I have a lot of input into web site content, and am
it's
"architect" as well as editor and maintainer.

Tony Poderis, creator of the Fund Raising Forum Library (see http://www.raise-funds.com/library.html) responded:

Jeff --- You can see the problem regarding the wide range of what one
person's "leeway and judgment" could entail from another's within the
same organization. That's not the stuff of an organization wide
communications plan—how and what it does to present itself to the
public at large, stemming from an organization's mission statement, its
goals and objectives, and its long-term strategic plan. Having a well thought out plan will
enable the webmaster and everyone connected to his or her organization to
speak, as best as possible, in the same 'voice'—while sending the
same message.

Every message an organization sends is in some way a representation of
that organization. The view people hold of an organization is a
combination of those representations and the messages others
disseminated about. In short, an organization's image is the sum total
of the messages it and others send about it. While an organization
cannot exercise direct control over the messages of others, it can and
should manage carefully the ones it sends.

Rather than weave back and forth, concerned about this posting on the
website, or that posting hurting the organization or that the
information provided to the webmaster is incorrect, the webmaster can
use those examples to urge that the organization come up with a plan to
adapt to (or at least consider) everyone's particular needs.

It might not be a far off guess that other of the organization's
internal media has its problems as well. So, the webmaster can do much
more for the overall and collective voice and image of the organization
by helping to bring all of the communications media together under an
organization wide communications policy.

Perhaps the following outline of the key working components which
should be at work in any organization's overall internal and external
plan, might be used as a guide.

The webmaster can help in the plan to take advantage of the
organization's existing general internal media—that managed and
controlled by the communications department, or to help to repair any
of its failings, or to work to develop a plan where there is none,
through the organization's:

  1. Website
  2. Annual report
  3. Annual meeting
  4. Speeches delivered by staff
  5. Relationships with media/press outlets that accept public service
    announcements—TV, radio, magazines, newspapers
  6. Newsletters


If a webmaster has problems with misinformation and inaccuracies being
pushed onto the website, I am certain that the problem is far deeper,
and only a sound, consensus driven, communications plan can solve the
problem. And that's something everyone at the organization needs to
address — and not to have various individuals making their own
determination of what is right or what is wrong for the organization on
a random basis — subject to widely and (wildly) different opinions.

Relative to what could be an organization's obvious need to produce an
overall communications policy in the instance you cited, a great deal
can be adapted from Carter McNamara's material on his Free Management
Library website:
http://www.mapnp.org/library/org_comm/org_comm.htm

As well, while fund-raising driven, perhaps my article on the subject
might be worked by a troubled webmaster from the "outside in" to show
his or her colleagues that no sound and successful fund-raising plan
can be developed if it cannot be based on the organization's overall
communications plan.

=>Developing a Communications Strategy For the Development Operation
http://www.raise-funds.com/012004forum.html

I do hope this helps in some way to guide some of your troubled
colleagues.




Character-conversion problems removed 10/30/05 -- PB